I love poetry. I love reading it; I love writing it. But when I say poetry, I don't necessarily mean poetry. Huh. You see, when I say that I love poetry, I 'm actually saying that I love only one specific type of poetry in particular. I love poetry with rhythm and rhyme. A lot poetry out there has neither of these factors-- or at least none of the poetry we're forced to study in school. In fact, English teachers even encourage students to read the poetry as fluently as a book, as if the line breaks weren't even there at all. Why do people bother putting in line breaks when they don't want the reader to pause at them. Most of the poetry out there is just nicely written paragraphs rearranged into stanzas to make them prettier to look at. Yes, I enjoy reading them sometimes because, yes, they can be written very eloquently and can sound quite nice. But when I say poetry, that just isn't the sort of thing I'm referring to.
So when I say that I love poetry, I suppose I'm lying. A more accurate statement would be that I love verse. Verse-- defined as having a metrical rhythm, and typically rhyming. As long as it's rhythmical, I can even deal with the lack of a rhyming scheme. Ah, how I love verse.
. . . And I like most poetry too.
As for Amanda Jernigan's poems, the last two were completely weird, but I did like the first one, "Bats". I liked the line where she said that the bats were "a serpent muscling air apart". Also, I just like bats so that probably helps...
